On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:51:17PM +0100, Jerome Martinez wrote:
> On 05/01/2018 11:18, Jerome Martinez wrote:
> >1 year without RGB48 related patches, tested by a couple of users, tested
> >with a FFV1 conformance checker, I suggest that FFV1 RGB48 support in
> >FFmpeg does not mandate anymore the user to add " -strict experimental" on
> >the command line during encoding.
> 
> Sorry, I missed the GBRP16 part.
> I tested the encoding through GBRP16 pix_fmt (instead of RGB48 pix_fmt), and
> it works fine too.
> Additional patch for removing the need of " -strict experimental" for GBRP16
> too.

>  ffv1enc.c |    4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 1af1e3f7fb3a0e866285623d6f5f1e65bfcebba0  
> 0001-avcodec-ffv1enc-mark-RGB48-support-as-non-experiment.patch
> From 511e036499f716b14fed7ec07d2d8ccf18936444 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Martinez?= <jer...@mediaarea.net>
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:15:54 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] avcodec/ffv1enc: mark RGB48 support as non-experimental
> 
> Remove the 2nd mark, 1st mark was removed in 58e16a4
> ---
>  libavcodec/ffv1enc.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

will apply

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The real ebay dictionary, page 1
"Used only once"    - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use"
"In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert"
"As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to