On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:02:02PM -0500, Calvin Walton wrote: > These tests cover specific rounding behaviour, to ensure that I don't > introduce any regressions with the rewritten "activate" callback based > fps filter. > --- > tests/fate/filter-video.mak | 10 +++++++++- > tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down | 15 +++++++++++++++ > tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down-eof-pass | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down-round-down | 15 +++++++++++++++ > tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down-round-up | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-up | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-up-round-down | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-up-round-up | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 8 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down-eof-pass > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down-round-down > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-down-round-up > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-up > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-up-round-down > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-fps-up-round-up
more tests are good, will apply thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know. -- Lao Tsu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
