On 3/8/18, Yingming Fan <yingming...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Yingming Fan <yingming...@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> We have 8 10 and 12 SIMD codes, but previous checkasm hevc_idct only test 8
> and 10 bit depth.
>
> tests/checkasm/hevc_idct.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/checkasm/hevc_idct.c b/tests/checkasm/hevc_idct.c
> index eea712101d..c20111c2df 100644
> --- a/tests/checkasm/hevc_idct.c
> +++ b/tests/checkasm/hevc_idct.c
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ void checkasm_check_hevc_idct(void)
> {
> int bit_depth;
>
> - for (bit_depth = 8; bit_depth <= 10; bit_depth++) {
> + for (bit_depth = 8; bit_depth <= 12; bit_depth += 2) {
> HEVCDSPContext h;
>
> ff_hevc_dsp_init(&h, bit_depth);
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void checkasm_check_hevc_idct(void)
> }
> report("idct_dc");
>
> - for (bit_depth = 8; bit_depth <= 10; bit_depth++) {
> + for (bit_depth = 8; bit_depth <= 12; bit_depth += 2) {
> HEVCDSPContext h;
>
> ff_hevc_dsp_init(&h, bit_depth);
Isn't this dropping 9 case?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
