On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:35:11 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> wm4 (2018-04-18): > > Like I said, this didn't even work. And the EOF behavior was changed > > anyway, how is that not an API break? That change also broke a whole > > lot of other things, so I can't quite understand your argument here. In > > fact, you should have rejected the EOF change patch which you pushed > > yourself. Wasn't this completely unacceptable? > > > > By the way, I'm trying to understand your arguments. But it's not easy > > because you never explain them and you just respond with general > > platitudes. I can't read your mind. > > This is not true, but I will not discuss it further with somebody who > has repeatedly badmouthed me. Even if that should be the case (which is debatable), you made definitely insults against me, yet I'm ready to attempt to discuss things on a technical level with you. But you're rejecting even that. I guess I'll propose a patch to revert these changes, then. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel