On 25 April 2018 at 22:22, Patrick Keroulas <
patrick.kerou...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:

> From: Damien Riegel <damien.rie...@savoirfairelinux.com>
>
> This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
> formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
> progressive and interlace is that either a packet will contain the whole
> frame, or only a field of the frame.
>
> There is no mechanism for interlaced frames reconstruction at the rtp
> demux level, so it has to be handled by the codec which needs to
> partially recompose an AVFrame with every incoming field AVPacket.
> A frame is ouput only when the frame is completed with the 2nd field
> (bottom).
>
> The additionnal field flags in AVPacket allow the decoder to dynamically
> determine the frame format, i.e. progressive or interlaced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Keroulas <patrick.kerou...@savoirfairelinux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Riegel <damien.rie...@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>
> Change v3 -> v4: cleanup
> ---
>  libavcodec/avcodec.h   |   8 ++++
>  libavcodec/bitpacked.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/avcodec.h b/libavcodec/avcodec.h
> index fb0c6fa..14811be 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/avcodec.h
> +++ b/libavcodec/avcodec.h
> @@ -1480,6 +1480,14 @@ typedef struct AVPacket {
>   */
>  #define AV_PKT_FLAG_DISPOSABLE 0x0010
>
> +/**
> + * The packet contains a top field.
> + */
> +#define AV_PKT_FLAG_TOP_FIELD  0x0020
> +/**
> + * The packet contains a bottom field.
> + */
> +#define AV_PKT_FLAG_BOTTOM_FIELD  0x0040
>
>  enum AVSideDataParamChangeFlags {
>      AV_SIDE_DATA_PARAM_CHANGE_CHANNEL_COUNT  = 0x0001,
> diff --git a/libavcodec/bitpacked.c b/libavcodec/bitpacked.c
> index 85d4bdd..380d784 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/bitpacked.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/bitpacked.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@
>  #include "libavutil/imgutils.h"
>
>  struct BitpackedContext {
> -    int (*decode)(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVFrame *frame,
> -                  AVPacket *pkt);
> +    int (*decode)(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVFrame *frame, AVPacket *pkt);
> +    AVFrame *cur_interlaced_frame;
> +    int prev_top_field;
>  };
>
>  /* For this format, it's a simple passthrough */
> @@ -60,22 +61,39 @@ static int bitpacked_decode_yuv422p10(AVCodecContext
> *avctx, AVFrame *frame,
>  {
>      uint64_t frame_size = (uint64_t)avctx->width *
> (uint64_t)avctx->height * 20;
>      uint64_t packet_size = (uint64_t)avpkt->size * 8;
> +    int interlaced = frame->interlaced_frame;
> +    int top_field = (avpkt->flags & AV_PKT_FLAG_TOP_FIELD) ? 1 : 0;
>      GetBitContext bc;
>      uint16_t *y, *u, *v;
>      int ret, i, j;
>
> -
> -    if (frame_size > packet_size)
> +    /* check packet size depending on the interlaced/progressive format */
> +    if (interlaced) {
> +        if ((frame_size / 2) > packet_size)
> +            return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
> +    } else if (frame_size > packet_size) {
>          return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
> +    }
>
>      if (avctx->width % 2)
>          return AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
>
> +    /*
> +     * if the frame is interlaced, the avpkt we are getting is either the
> top
> +     * or the bottom field. If it's the bottom field, it contains all the
> odd
> +     * lines of the recomposed frame, so we start at offset 1.
> +     */
> +    i = (interlaced && !top_field) ? 1 : 0;
> +
>      ret = init_get_bits(&bc, avpkt->data, avctx->width * avctx->height *
> 20);
>      if (ret)
>          return ret;
>
> -    for (i = 0; i < avctx->height; i++) {
> +    /*
> +     * Packets from interlaced frames contain either even lines, or odd
> +     * lines, so increment by two in that case.
> +     */
> +    for (; i < avctx->height; i += 1 + interlaced) {
>          y = (uint16_t*)(frame->data[0] + i * frame->linesize[0]);
>          u = (uint16_t*)(frame->data[1] + i * frame->linesize[1]);
>          v = (uint16_t*)(frame->data[2] + i * frame->linesize[2]);
> @@ -100,17 +118,35 @@ static av_cold int bitpacked_init_decoder(AVCodecContext
> *avctx)
>
>      if (avctx->codec_tag == MKTAG('U', 'Y', 'V', 'Y')) {
>          if (avctx->bits_per_coded_sample == 16 &&
> -            avctx->pix_fmt == AV_PIX_FMT_UYVY422)
> +            avctx->pix_fmt == AV_PIX_FMT_UYVY422) {
> +
> +            if (avctx->field_order > AV_FIELD_PROGRESSIVE) {
> +                av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "interlaced not yet supported
> for 8-bit\n");
> +                return AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
> +            }
> +
>              bc->decode = bitpacked_decode_uyvy422;
> -        else if (avctx->bits_per_coded_sample == 20 &&
> -                 avctx->pix_fmt == AV_PIX_FMT_YUV422P10)
> +        } else if (avctx->bits_per_coded_sample == 20 &&
> +                 avctx->pix_fmt == AV_PIX_FMT_YUV422P10) {
>              bc->decode = bitpacked_decode_yuv422p10;
> -        else
> +        } else {
>              return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
> +        }
>      } else {
>          return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
>      }
>
> +    bc->cur_interlaced_frame = av_frame_alloc();
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static av_cold int bitpacked_end_decoder(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> +{
> +    struct BitpackedContext *bc = avctx->priv_data;
> +
> +    av_frame_free(&bc->cur_interlaced_frame);
> +
>      return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -131,13 +167,61 @@ static int bitpacked_decode(AVCodecContext *avctx,
> void *data, int *got_frame,
>              return res;
>      }
>
> -    res = bc->decode(avctx, frame, avpkt);
> -    if (res)
> -        return res;
>

You moved the get_buffer call above here, which is okay, but you always
call it, regardless of whether there's a need for it (when there's a top
field in your context and you've just received a bottom field packet you
still call get_buffer).
You should move the get_buffer call in the if () branches and just live
with the duplicated few lines (once for when you receive top field and once
for progressive).



> +    if ((avpkt->flags & AV_PKT_FLAG_TOP_FIELD) &&
> +        (avpkt->flags & AV_PKT_FLAG_BOTTOM_FIELD)) {
> +        av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "Invalid field flags.\n");
> +        return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
>

I think this should be handled by libavcodec/utils.c and rejected there.
Opinions from other people?


+    } else if (avpkt->flags & AV_PKT_FLAG_TOP_FIELD) {
> +        if (bc->prev_top_field)
> +            av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "Consecutive top field
> detected.\n");
>
> -    *got_frame = 1;
> -    return buf_size;
> +        frame->interlaced_frame = 1;
> +        frame->top_field_first = 1;
>
> +        /* always decode the top (1st) field and ref the result frame
> +         * but don't output anything */
> +        if ((res = bc->decode(avctx, frame, avpkt)) < 0)
> +            return res;
> +
> +        av_frame_unref(bc->cur_interlaced_frame);
> +        if ((res = av_frame_ref(bc->cur_interlaced_frame, frame)) < 0)
> +            return res;
> +
> +        bc->prev_top_field = 1;
> +
> +        return 0;
> +    } else if (avpkt->flags & AV_PKT_FLAG_BOTTOM_FIELD) {
> +        if (!bc->prev_top_field) {
> +            av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "Top field missing.\n");
> +            return 0;
> +        }
> +
> +        frame->interlaced_frame = 1;
> +        frame->top_field_first = 1;
> +
> +        /* complete the ref'd frame with bottom field and output the
> +         * result */
> +        if ((res = bc->decode(avctx, bc->cur_interlaced_frame, avpkt)) <
> 0)
> +            return res;
> +
> +        if ((res = av_frame_ref(frame, bc->cur_interlaced_frame)) < 0)
> +            return res;
> +
> +        bc->prev_top_field = 0;
> +        *got_frame = 1;
> +        return buf_size;
> +    } else {
> +        /* No field: the frame is progressive.
> +         * Drop eventual top field. */
> +        if (bc->prev_top_field)
> +            av_frame_unref(bc->cur_interlaced_frame);
>

"eventual"? This makes no sense, the top field is already there. Just
remove the comment, its obvious from the code what's happening.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to