2018-04-26 13:17 GMT+02:00, Josh de Kock <j...@itanimul.li>: > On 2017/06/26 15:09, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Rationale: >> - Slower then other encoder >> - Less configurable >> - Does not support alpha profile >> - Does not set interlaced flag >> - Worse output quality >> - No need for 2 encoders >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> >> > Is there any reason this was not pushed? > I can't seem to see any argument against it.
It was shown in the past that this encoder is faster, more efficient and produces better quality. I don't know when this has changed. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
