On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:41:55 +0200 Daniel Oberhoff <danieloberh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On 26. Apr 2018, at 14:40, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:12:14 +0200 > > Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com <mailto:h.lepp...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Oberhoff > >> <danieloberh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff > >>>> <danieloberh...@googlemail.com>: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:56 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff > >>>>> <danieloberh...@googlemail.com>: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:52 schrieb Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Daniel Oberhoff (2018-04-26): > >>>>>>> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github? > >>>>>>> I.e. not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and > >>>>>>> pull requests? Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think of > >>>>>>> submitting a pr instead of having to generate/format/split patches). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If development involves working in a web browser a lot, count me out. > >>>>>> Can you point me to the command-line > >>>>> > >>>>> https://hub.github.com/hub.1.html > >>>> > >>>> But you can’t really do reviews that way, so the criticism stands. > >>> > >>> BTW, is there any kind of issue tracking? > >> > >> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ > > > > To be fair, I'd prefer the github issue tracker over TRAC any day. > > Still has the other problems I mentioned. > > gitlab? > That would mostly get rid of the centralization argument. But I've heard bad things from someone who wanted to setup a private instance of it. Apparently it has a large number of dependencies, is extremely hard to deploy (unless you use their docker container), and it's SLOW. In fact even gitlab.com seems to have severe performance problems occasionally. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
