2018-04-27 1:28 GMT+02:00, Josh de Kock <j...@itanimul.li>: > On 2018/04/27 0:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-04-27 1:08 GMT+02:00, Josh de Kock <j...@itanimul.li>: >>> The postproc library is only used in a single filter >> >> Is libswscale used in more filters? Are you planning to >> deprecate it? > > No, libswscale does not suffer from the same issue of being a secondary > filter library. See for example how libavresample is the secondary > resampling library, which has been deprecated for being regarded as > worse than libswscale. libpostproc is just another filtering library > (which was shoved into lavfi instead of its filters being moved into > lavfi). Some of the postproc filters seemingly have equivalents in lavfi > (just going off of names), so I think removal of postproc while making > sure equivalent filters will be available is the best way to solve this.
I am a little surprised: Could you explain which filters in libavfilter are the equivalents for the functionality of libpostproc? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel