On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:04 PM Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net> wrote:

> On 05/11/18 15:20, Gyan wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:23 PM Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net> wrote:
> >
> >> ---
> >> Updated to add some more explanation of the rate control mode selection.
> >>
> >>
> >>  doc/encoders.texi | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 108 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/doc/encoders.texi b/doc/encoders.texi
> >> index 1ca0ef1543..f2e4199017 100644
> >> --- a/doc/encoders.texi
> >> +++ b/doc/encoders.texi
> >> @@ -1370,6 +1370,114 @@ makes it possible to store non-rgb pix_fmts.
> >>
> >>  @end table
> >>
> >> +@section libaom-av1
> >> +
> >> +libaom AV1 encoder wrapper.
> >> +
> >> +Requires the presence of the libaom headers and library during
> >> +configuration.  You need to explicitly configure the build with
> >> +@code{--enable-libaom}.
> >> +
> >> +@subsection Options
> >> +
> >> +The wrapper supports the following standard libavcodec options:
> >>
> >
> > Do we really need to duplicate the text for the generic options? That
> will
> > lead to bloat if widely adopted.
>
> Which parts do you object to?  This text is trying to explain how the
> standard options apply to libaom and what their defaults are.
>

Makes sense. But items like g, the color props or profile are covered by
the generic text. Maybe for completeness' sake, we should keep them here.

LGTM

Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to