On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 17:22 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com wrote: > 2018-11-14 2:21 GMT+01:00, Jan Ekström <jee...@gmail.com>: > > Internally in ISOBMFF the FLAC-in-ISOBMFF draft uses the "fLaC" > > as the identifier for FLACSampleEntry, but what the browsers > > seem to eat for MPEG-DASH manifests is plain "flac". > > Does this patch also answer the recent discussion about > specifications vs real-world tests? >
No. The ISOBMFF side is followed properly, and nobody cared to test flac until now with dash manifests. The default code path utilizes the ISOBMFF identifier for dash manifest entries, which matches things such as avc/hevc/aac etc. Not to mention that there doesn't seem to be a spec for the dash manifest side of things for flac. At all. It just seems to follow the mime type. So no, this is not the same thing. At all. Jan > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
