2018-12-04 14:32 GMT+01:00, Gyan Doshi <gyando...@gmail.com>: > On 04-12-2018 06:38 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-12-04 13:53 GMT+01:00, Gyan Doshi <gyando...@gmail.com>: >>> On 04-12-2018 06:15 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>>> 2018-12-04 12:10 GMT+01:00, Gyan Doshi <g...@videolan.org>: >>>> >>>>> +@section Chromaprint >>>>> + >>>>> +FFmpeg can make use of the Chromaprint library for generating audio >>>>> fingerprints. >>>> >>>>> +It is licensed under LGPL version 2.1. >>>> >>>> No other library is described like this. >>>> Why are you adding legal statements that are unneeded? >>> >>> I see licensing notes for libxavs2, libdavs2, "OpenCORE, VisualOn, and >>> Fraunhofer libraries", x264 & x265. >>> >>> Is the situation for chromaprint and GME different than for the libs >>> above >> >> Yes, very much so. > > Please explain.
The license is only mentioned for projects that are not LGPL-compatible, it is unneeded to mention LGPL-compatibility. I start to wonder how good your insurance is... Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
