On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:00:54 +0100 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:58:34AM +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > > In this function, the exact same clamping happens both in the if and > > unconditionally. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen <c...@gmx.com> > > --- > > libswscale/output.c | 10 ---------- > > 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) > > > > v2: Remove the unconditional instead of the if'd clipping. > > I'll leave changing the bit pattern to others, there's so many funcs using > > 0x100. > > > > diff --git a/libswscale/output.c b/libswscale/output.c > > index d7c53e6..d3401f0 100644 > > --- a/libswscale/output.c > > +++ b/libswscale/output.c > > should be ok > > thanks Applying. - Lauri _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
