On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:34:04AM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/19/19, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > > Paul B Mahol (12019-04-19): > >> This is not about sample rate negotiation. > > > > Yes it is. > > Give proof. > > No, you need to argue better your pathetic behavior. > > > > >> Bad argumentation. > > > > Then argue better. > > > > Patches rejected for now. > > Look, you are full of shit. And know nothing about audio processing.
As i have been asked to look into this (and as we dont have many other ML admins currently) This is a technical mailing list, arguing about how much you love each other does not belong here. As a remainder Everyone, the subject of discussions should be FFmpeg and the technologies sorounding it. Insults, "Ad hominem" argumentation/attacks, and so on lead to a hostile climate that helps noone not even the one winning the argument eventually. If theres a disagreement on a patch (one wanting it in one not wanting it in and after technical discussion its not resolved), we can if everything else fails do a vote on the patch. A technical solution with technical arguments is better though than a vote. Thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
