On Fri, 3 May 2019, at 07:27, Jeyapal, Karthick wrote: > Open source violation by NDI is a serious issue that needs to be > addressed. But removing the libndi plugin from the ffmpeg repository > will not address the issue of violation. A willful violator can still
You are confusing 2 things: - the violation of FFmpeg and x264 license from NDI, and the usual hostility of Newtek towards our community, - the violation of this project ideas by allowing linking a completely-closed source library. Problem [1] made a lot of people look at problem [2], because not many people had looked at it closely. Because of [1], people looked at [2] and realized that this was not OK, and different from the rest of the FFmpeg project, especially since we refused librmhd and other closed-source libraries. So please don't make it a vote about [1], when it is a vote about [2]. -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
