On 5/12/19, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/12/19, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: >> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 11:00:51PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: >>> Marton Balint (12019-05-12): >>> > Yeah, you are right, what I had in mind was this: >>> > >>> > apitch === asetrate,aresample,atempo >>> >>> Exactly. And reciprocally, atempo = apitch+asetrate+aresample. >>> >>> Furthermore, since it works with the spectrum, the filter that does the >>> hard work can probably easily output at any sample rate, at a cost much >>> lower than resampling afterwards. Therefore, it makes most sense to have >>> a single filter with all three parameters (sample rate, speed adjustment >>> and pitch adjustment). >> >> and if thats done in our resampler than that can also be combined with >> changing the channel order, layout, sample type and so on. >> Iam not sure its a good idea but purely technically it should be more >> efficient to do it all together. >> Also swresample already supports an external FFT resampler so it might >> actually fit in there nicely and it might even allow us to remove an >> external >> dependancy without loosing a feature. (assuming the new FFT resampler >> would be equally good) >> >> > > To make it work dynamically, filter must resample audio internally. >
Can I get testers? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
