On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:21 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 08:28 Uhr schrieb Marton Balint <g...@videolan.org>:
> > [...]
> > + if (ctx->has_alpha_channel &&
> > + (img->d_w != img_alpha->d_w ||
> > + img->d_h != img_alpha->d_h ||
> > + img->bit_depth != img_alpha->bit_depth)) {
> > + av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR,
> > + "Video dimensions %dx%d@%dbpp differ from alpha
> > dimensions %dx%d@%dbpp\n",
> > + img->d_w, img->d_h, img->bit_depth,
> > + img_alpha->d_w, img_alpha->d_h, img_alpha->bit_depth);
> > + return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
>
> Shouldn't this be "bpc" instead of "bpp"?
>
I tend to use them interchangeably, but bpc may be more precise here.
I sent a patch.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
