On 11/13/2019 12:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>
>> Am 12.11.2019 um 04:01 schrieb James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 11/11/2019 2:36 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 11.11.2019 um 22:36 schrieb James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> +AVInputFormat ff_obu_demuxer = {
>>>> + .name = "obu",
>>>
>>> Why is the demuxer not called “av1”?
>>>
>>> Thank you, Carl Eugen
>>> (Sleepless in Japan)
>>
>> I liked obu more, being the extension used for Annex B encapsulated
>> samples, but i'm fine changing it to av1 if others prefer that.
>
> I would have preferred av1 ...
You'll be happy to know i decided to go with your suggestion, then :p
>
>>
>> The problem will be what to do with the eventual raw Section 5 OBU demuxer.
>
> ... but I have no idea what the Section 5 demuxer is (or which one of the two
> is more likely to need on occasion demuxer forcing).
"Section 5" is just raw AV1 OBUs, and what gets multiplexed into
containers. It's similar to raw h264 NALUs.
"Annex B" is a trivial encapsulation for said raw OBUs, to easily
delimit frames and Temporal Units. I can barely be considered a container.
I called the Annex B demuxer av1. An eventual raw OBU demuxer can then
be called obu.
>
> Carl Eugen
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
