Am 27.02.20 um 11:56 schrieb Lynne: > Feb 27, 2020, 09:09 by agho...@teknik.io: > >> February 26, 2020 12:27 PM, "Anamitra Ghorui" <agho...@teknik.io> wrote: >> >>> c. I have been looking at the decoder/encoder/parser of the BMP format >>> (which is one of the simplest image formats), the actual decoding work >>> (according to me), i.e. Finding the magic numbers, seeing the various >>> segments is being done by the decoder function and not the parser. >>> >> >> I meant to say, "the actual 'parsing' work, according to me, is >> being done by the decoder" >> >> I'm sorry if I had come off as rude in my post. It wasn't my intention. >> > > AFAIK, flif isn't stable (no spec, bitstream may change) and is kind of dead > since the author > moved on to work on JPEG XL to my knowledge. > > I don't think we should be implementing this decoder.
We had have this discussion before creating a project out of it. They proclaimed it stable themselves. What do we care if their author now works on something else? Anamitra, please don't get confused about that. -Thilo _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
