On 11/03/2020 20:42, Martin Storsjö wrote: > FWIW, while I agree it shouldn't be the default, I have occasionally > considered the need for this particular feature.
Arguably slice threading should be used, but that assumes you have sane input, which is obviously not always the case for some. > Consider a live stream with a very variable framerate, essentially varying > in the full range between 0 and 60 fps. To cope with decoding the high end > of the framerate range, one needs to have frame threading enabled - maybe > not with something crazy like 16 threads, but say at least 5 or so. > > Then you need to feed 5 packets into the decoder before you get the first > frame output (for a stream without any reordering). That last bit is key there, but yes. > > Now if packets are received at 60 fps, you get one new packet to feed the > decoder per 16 ms, and you get the first frame to output 83 ms later, > assuming that the decoding of that individual frame on that thread took > less than 83 ms (I'm assuming network, etc. has been left out for example's sake. :)) > However, if the rate of input packets drops to e.g. 1 packet per second, > it will take 5 seconds before I have 5 packets to feed to the decoder, > before I have the first frame output, even though it actually was finished > decoding in say less than 100 ms after the first input packet was given to > the decoder. > > So in such a setup, being able to fetch output frames from the decoder > sooner would be very useful - giving a closer to fixed decoding time in > wallclock time, regardless of the packet input rate. Not sure I would refer to it as closer to fixed, but the use case is certainly valid - I never claimed otherwise. If it is added, it needs be behind a flag/option with big bold letters saying the risks, and off by default. And that segfault Michael saw investigated. Thanks for the clear response that doesn't conflate the two. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".