Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> added the comment:

On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:29:06PM +0000, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> It fixes some, but not all. wc -l of valgrind ffmpeg goes from ~2000 to 
> ~400, but still more warnings remain:
> 
> ==61513== Invalid read of size 4
> ==61513==    at 0x10036E8BA: vc1_decode_i_blocks_adv (in ./ffmpeg_g)
> ==61513==    by 0x3000000017: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x1010DC41F: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x7FFF0000000C: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x300000019: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x16FFFFFFFF: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x7FFF5FBFE46B: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x7FFF5FBFE467: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x7FFF5FBFE463: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x10105FFF2: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x58FF: ???
> ==61513==    by 0x11: ???
> ==61513==  Address 0x1010beedc is 3,436 bytes inside a block of size 
> 3,439 alloc'd

*shrug* that's a one-byte overread, I do not care that much about that.
I don't think this is really the right place to discuss this, the
bug report was about a "stack overflow", assuming that means a "stack
buffer overflow" (as in, writes+on stack) that is really, really
serious and needs to be fixed ASAP.
These overreads do not.

________________________________________________
FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]>
<https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/issue2584>
________________________________________________

Reply via email to