On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:59:16PM +0100, Robert Swain wrote: > Geza Kovacs wrote: >> Sorry, that's just how the commits are in my local git branch; that is >> the verbatim output of git format-patch, and is there merely as backup >> as I can't mirror the entire tree. I don't aim to merge in these >> patches verbatim (by the time I'm done I'll have rewritten half this >> code anyhow); rather I'll let git merge, rebase, and squash them into >> a single patch once I reach a reasonable milestone which can cleanly >> be applied upstream, at which time I'll notify the mailing list; >> please ignore the files in my branch for now. > > I agree with your methodology. Using git kind of encourages such behaviour > locally in my opinion. And I could wholly understand you wanting to back up > your progress so far by creating the patches and committing them to the svn > SoC repo.
I somehow doubt this is the most reasonable way to backup a git repo. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. -- Voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
