On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Robert Swain <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 05:24 -0500, Alex Converse wrote: >> NINT as specified in 14496-3 is round away from zero which corresponds >> to lroundf not lrintf. I looked at all the places where it could >> actually affect the result and I found two places but it might be >> better to change them all to be safe. Thoughts? > > I'm generally inclined to do what the spec says unless we can prove it > has no effect and alternatives are faster/cleaner or real world > implementations do something different that is somehow better...? >
Speaking of real world implementations my guess is we'll need an lroundf replacement (just like lrintf...) in internal.h for systems lacking C99 libm. *sigh* _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
