On 2014-08-26 10:58, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:23:56 +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote: >> you are seeing, and the delogo filter isn't at fault. Except perhaps >> for the reason that it only accepts these pix_fmts: >> >> yuv444p, yuv422p, yuv420p, yuv411p, yuv410p, yuv440p, yuva420p, gray8 > > Repeat disclaimer: I have _absolutely no idea_ what I'm doing! > Nevertheless, if I patch the delogo filter to accept rgb24 and retest, > I detect only a very minor difference when inspecting with the > "compare" tool. (There's also a minor visual difference.)
Did you try adding yuvj420p? What about the other yuvj* "colourspaces"? I'm not familiar the filter at all but using interleaved RGB data could be very wrong if it treats neighbouring samples as separate pixels.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
