> On 2016 Jan 6, at 4:04 AM, Andy Furniss <adf.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess superfast hides the gain of the first pass. I am not sure I > would want to encode with it using 3M ABR - which is quite low, but > then libx265 is quite slow.
Normally I use ‘medium', or now ‘slow' because I’ve got my NAS set up with ffmpeg and just let it crank there in its own sweet time. I started with testing a range of bitrates at medium 2-pass from a bluray source. At least looking at the pngs, I found I couldn’t really see any clear improvement above 2 Mb/sec, so I chose 3. I can’t distinguish it from the source (except for the light/dark business in some cases). Do you think the ‘png test’ doesn’t give a good comparison? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user