On 5/10/17, Dave Rice <d...@dericed.com> wrote: > >> On May 10, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 5/10/17, Dave Rice <d...@dericed.com <mailto:d...@dericed.com>> wrote: >>> Hi ffmpeg-user, >>> >>> In some cases I've been using -vf and -filter_complex interchangeability >>> but >>> notice that some behavior is unexpectedly different. >>> >>> For instance if I use format=yuv422p10le within -vf and within >>> -filter_complex the output is different. Is there something else I should >>> add to the filterchain to get consistent results. >>> >>> Below is the output of: >>> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc2=r=1:d=5 -vf format=yuv422p10le -f >>> framemd5 - >>> and >>> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc2=r=1:d=5 -filter_complex format=yuv422p10le -f >>> framemd5 - >> >> Both commands are suboptimal, use: >> >> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc2=r=1:d=5,format=yuv422p10le -f framemd5 - > > I usually avoid lavfi formatted inputs when I can, because IIUC there's no > method to preserve frame interlacement data from the input through the > filterchain. See https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/4057.
How is that even related? format simply tells in what format testsrc2 will render its output. By your command it is doing slow scale work internally always. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
