It "should" work assuming your transcoding/disk can keep up with realtime ...
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Jim DeLaHunt <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2018-06-28 14:21, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > 2018-06-28 21:58 GMT+02:00, Jim DeLaHunt <[email protected]>: >> >> We tried a simple experiment. We set up a 4K camera in the >>> office. A straightforward ffmpeg invocation did capture a >>> couple of minutes of video. But there were nasty artifacts >>> >> Command line and complete, uncut console outupt missing. >> >> In this case, you should also tell us which operating system >> you have, which cpu and which graphics-card (if applicable). >> > > You are missing the question. > > I am not asking for help to diagnose that simple experiment. I am asking > if others have had experience with the top-level goal: capturing hours of > 4k video, reliably and with low loss, using ffmpeg. > > I can use whatever capture card, operating system, CPU, and graphics card > are necessary to build a system that works, and costs less than what Vendor > A would charge us for their closed system. > > -- > --Jim DeLaHunt, [email protected] http://blog.jdlh.com/ ( > http://jdlh.com/) > multilingual websites consultant > > 355-1027 Davie St, Vancouver BC V6E 4L2, Canada > Canada mobile +1-604-376-8953 > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
