2018-12-08 14:05 GMT+01:00, Kieran O Leary <kieran.o.le...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018, 12:48 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com wrote: > >> 2018-12-08 13:45 GMT+01:00, Kieran O Leary <kieran.o.le...@gmail.com>: >> >> > So I guess that TIFF, and DPX need to be mapped in the Matroska >> > specification? >> >> Not sure if I am the right person to answer but why would you want to >> put images into another container? >> >> Shouldn't you keep the original image files and use ffmpeg to produce >> a view copy in the requested quality? > > Image sequences are difficult to deal with,especially with LTO tape > libraries. Archives commonly use zip in either a compressed or > uncompressed form to alleviate this issue.
How does this contradict what I write above? Assuming a current high-quality, widely adopted video codec for the view copy would be obsolete after a decade (that's too soon, no?), that would mean one necessary access to the file system every ten years: Is that too difficult to deal with? > It's preferable to have an uncompressed or lossless single > file for ease of use I don't think so... (But fortunately, it is your decision!) Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
