> On Dec 20, 2018, at 1:03 AM, Taner Sener <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 19:08, Ronak <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> 
>> Therefore, I'm trying to find out the best way to convert the Ffmpeg
> .dylibs to .frameworks.
>> 
>> I tried to just package the .dylibs (rename it) and make a .framework
> manually, but libavfilter (and the other libs) all depend on headers
> defined in libavutil...has anyone already figured out how to do this
> conversion?
>> 
> 
> I'm not sure if this is what you look for, but you can create a different
> .framework for each .dylib file. At the end you will have 
> libavcodec.framework,
> libavdevice.framework, libavfilter.framework, etc. Then you can link your
> framework to them.


Yup that’s what I tried but the headers include headers from the other 
frameworks (like avutil). And it didn’t compile.

Frameworks aren’t really set up to support including the way that ffmpeg does 
it. 

The other options I can think of are to switch to static linking and stuff that 
into a framework (combining all of the libs into one static lib and thus one 
.framework).

As for distribution and the license, my companies lawyers have indicated it 
would be okay as long as we follow the requirements but we will check with them 
again before shipping.

> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to