2019-02-01 19:40 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de>: > Am 31.01.19 um 00:18 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: >> This masterpiece (make sure you don't miss the imdb comment) >> was most likely made with a film camera that knew nothing about >> interlacing. > > I'm sure this is true at least for the opening credits, as there are > flashing dropouts, typical for celluloid films. So here the > masterpiece has progressive content, was telecined and in the > end copied to VHS with interlaced signal.
Yes, this is correct, yadif is able to nicely remove the interlace artefacts but I believe it leads to even more distortions in the rest of the video. > But for the rest of the video, I'm wondering that I nowhere notice such > dropouts. IIRC I read, that the film was produced with a budget of > 20.000 DM, which IMHO is not enough for a 76 min. celluloid film. > Additionally in the turning camera scene from 2:34 I see comb > artifacts, which are typical for interlaced video recordings (see > attached extractions). Definitely not interlaced (could be de-interlaced, but this doesn't make much difference because of the other visual issues). Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".