On Sun, 20 Oct 2019, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 20.10.2019 um 23:05 schrieb Hans Carlson <forb...@gmx.com>:
Is there any advantage (or disadvantage) to using the fps filter vs the
-r option in this particular case?
The main difference between the fps filter and the constant frame rate
output that can be forced by the command line utility is that the filter
is less verbose. The algorithms are not equally greedy but it is likely
that this makes little or no difference for your use case.
Ah, so the fps filter *could* display the same/similar kind of "frames
duplicated" messages, it just doesn't. Thanks Carl, that's kind of what I
suspected.
PS. I do realize there may be instances (eg. different codecs and/or
increasing fps) where the filter vs -r option could make more of a
difference. But in this instance, as you say, probably nothing noticeable.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
