Hm. Well is it possible to get down to 6 MB per minute, 1 MB per 10 seconds?
Regards, Morten man. 4. nov. 2019, 17:48 skrev Ted Park <[email protected]>: > > Which codec gives the lowest size? > > > > Let me ask in a different way, how can I encode a video to the smallest > > possible size, while still discerning some movement? > > > Now we’re getting somewhere. x264/x265 are like the de facto gold > standards for the software encoders for the ITU/ISO/IEC codecs, h.265 is > more efficient wrt file size, and vpx is comparable if you need/prefer OAM > family. > > It still sounds like all you want to do is compress the video until it is > fubar, is there a maximum limit on the size that you need it to be? Because > then multi-pass encoding could be an option. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
