Am Mi., 11. März 2020 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Carl Zwanzig <[email protected]>: > > On 3/11/2020 8:40 AM, Ted Park wrote: > > I’m just curious, but if this kind of question was posed to a > > less-than-scrupulous party, and they sell the querier a compatible binary > > and source with the GPL license, is there any way to be recompensed if > > he/she finds out it could have been obtained for free later on? > There are a few cases where the authors of Busybox sued and won over > inclusion in a product and binary distribution in violation of the GPL (2, I > think). That was a bit easier as there were only a couple of people involved.
They sued because no source code was provided, the question was if you are allowed to charge money for providing a binary of free software. (You are allowed) Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
