On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 17:32:42 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote: > > With loglevel verbose, I get: > >> Reading option '-f' ... matched as option 'f' (force format) with argument > >> '-i'. > > I wonder why ffmpeg doesn't trip over this first. Whatever. > -f is paired with -i and file.ts is interpreted as output URL so > -filter_complex gets correctly paired with its arg.
Well understood. However I was wondering about the order of evaluation, and somehow expecting > [NULL @ 0xbdaf800] Requested output format '-i' is not a suitable output > format but ffmpeg certainly has its reasons for this order. Cheers, Moritz _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".