Mark Filipak wrote > By the way, 'interleave' not recognizing end-of-stream (or 'select' not > generating end-of-stream, > whichever the cause) isn't a big deal as I'll be queuing up transcodes -- > as many as I can -- to run > overnight.
But it would be nice to find some way to terminate, especially if you were batching . The "hang" limits what you can do if you were processing sequentially overnight If you have known framecount, you can enter "-frames:v whatever" to send the end signal. In that example, -frames:v 600. But it hangs prior to the end, at 598. One way might to duplicate the last frame, or add with -vf tpad, then cut it off with -frames:v If you add tpad=stop=1 to the end of each selection, the end result is the last 2 frames are duplicates , but at least it terminates ffmpeg -i 23.976p_framenumber.mp4 -filter_complex "telecine=pattern=5,split[A][B],[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))',tpad=stop=1[C],[B]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)',pp=lb,tpad=stop=1[D],[C][D]interleave" -c:v libx264 -crf 18 -frames:v 600 -an out_tpad.mkv But another issue is "automatically" getting the proper frame count and entering that telecined=5 output frame number value into the -frames:v field (it should be 2.5x the original framecount). It should be possible use ffprobe to parse the framecount, and plugging that variable into a ffmpeg, but it's beyond my batch scripting knowledge -- Sent from: http://www.ffmpeg-archive.org/ _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
