On 09/06/2020 03:31 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 6. Sept. 2020 um 19:07 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
First, Carl Eugen, could you fix your email client so that it doesn't echo people's email addresses
in the clear?
-snip-
So-called "progressive" video -- I prefer "concurrent" -- is contained in
interlaced data structures
within the macroblocks. Hard telecined video (which may or may not be
concurrent depending on
whether it comes from cinema or from TV) is contained in deinterlaced data
within the macroblocks
that the decoder interlaces to make frames as part of the decoding process. My
question has to do
with whether, for soft telecine, the fields in the chrominance blocks of
undecoded macroblocks is
deinterlaced or interlaced.
As said before: I don't think this makes sense (not even for mpeg2 video).
I offered to post pictures but you didn't respond. I really like pictures. Pictures don't generally
require explanations. Written text in lieu of pictures is counterproductive. The more that is
written, the more that can be wrong or misunderstood. ffmpeg documentation doesn't have (avoids?)
pictures. Why is that?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
