On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:48 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Fr., 11. Sept. 2020 um 15:48 Uhr schrieb Robert Krüger > <krueger@lesspain.software>: > > > I'm playing around with rav1e and noticed in my first test that only one > > core is used of the 8 (16 virtual) I have. I tried with and without > > -threads setting. Since most other codecs behave this way I was expecting > > it to use as many cores as possible if not constrained by the command > line. > > Your question sounds as if you tested the rav1e command line utility > and it was able to use more than one thread. > Did you? > > No, and I should do that. I tested libaom-av1, found its speed far too slow to be usable, then read that rav1 had been developed exactly to provide a faster encoder for real-world use and assumed that multithreading must be a part of it, because without it, it seems to be just as unusable as libaom-av1 for many practical use cases. Robert _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".