Yes, it's for personal use, However if you compile two separate versions there would be no licensing issue if you share it, would it?
El lun., 26 oct. 2020 5:49, Carl Zwanzig <[email protected]> escribió: > On 10/25/2020 9:16 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: > > my question is derived from the license problem that does not allow > > gpl codecs together with non-free codecs > > I may be mistaken, but as I understand the GPL, if you're not distributing > anything (building for your own use), there are no license problems with > mixing GPL and non-free/encumbered/proprietary components. That means you > could use -enable-nonfree and -enable-gpl at the same time (I can't > actually > try that at the moment). > > If you -do- want to distribute ffmpeg, then you simply can't mix GPL and > proprietary/non-free parts. > > z! > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
