> hi, out of curiosity, why one would need to probe (with crazy 100M probesize) x11 capture and why to use 5.1 on 1080p@24 when 4.2 would be enough ?
Because this is a generic script not limited to 1080p. That way I can use it for 4k as well what is not possible with level 4.2. Furthermore, with x11grab you get raw-image input what is remarkably big at 4k. But actually I don't really care about the size as long it's sufficiently large. Cheers, Stephan Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 12:02 Uhr schrieb andrei ka <andrei.k....@gmail.com>: > > ffmpeg -video_size "$resolution"\ > > > ¦ ¦ -loglevel warning \ > > ¦ ¦ -probesize 100M \ > > ¦ .... > > ¦ ¦ -f x11grab -i ":0.0+$xpos,$ypos" \ > > ¦ ¦ .. > > ¦ ¦ -level:v 5.1 \ > > > > Where resolution is in the format e.g. 1920x1080; xpos, ypos are > > integers -- possibly zero, if you take the complete screen. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Stephan > > > > hi, out of curiosity, why one would need to probe (with crazy 100M > probesize) x11 capture and why to use 5.1 on 1080p@24 when 4.2 would be > enough ? > &rei > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".