On 01/20/2021 06:17 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Motion compensation does not work that way.
Thank you, Paul. Yes, I knew that. I'm not seeking motion compensation. Kindly reread my filter
features and suggest what comes closest. What I seek simply works on pixels. I'm relying on your
experience (and perhaps the experiences of others here).
Regards,
Mark.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:45 AM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) <markfili...@bog.us>
wrote:
Hello All,
I seek a decomb filter that operates on H/2 number of line pairs: lines i
& i+1 (where i=0..H/2-1),
by aligning edges in the two lines at x = delta-x(edge)/2 (i.e. the
median). The ideal filter would
differentiate overall motion due to panning versus local motion due to
local object motion.
Pan-combing on the left & right edges is acceptable but it would be a
great bonus if the filter
performed blend on those edges with the blending radius equal to one-half
the pan-comb.
Vertical, line-pair-to-line-pair processing is not needed or desired.
Frame-to-frame processing is not needed or desired.
I have been trying a great number of filters based on their names and what
is in the documentation.
The best I've found so far is pp=linblenddeint but it obviously doesn't
align edges via the edge
median and it obviously isn't aware of pan-combing versus
object-motion-combing.
Any suggestions are very welcome. If I find this filter I will post a link
to a 60FPS telecined
video that will amaze everyone -- better than anything that Cuda can do.
-Mark.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
