On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 11:13 PM Carl Zwanzig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/27/2021 1:57 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > You will be sued if you continue to share binaries built with -non-free > > configure option. > > Are you a lawyer in his jurisdiction? If not, then the threats are > meaningless. And do you even know if he _has_ distributed ffmpeg w/ > "non-free"?? If not, then there is no issue. > Again. I'm not threatening, I'm just being kind to impolite person so person does not get sued by bigger fish. > How about, instead, simply pointing out what "non-free" means in the > context > of ffmpeg and why it's a bad idea. > > > > Martin- > Unless you -really- need --enable-gpl and --enable-nonfree, I'd drop them > both. (see https://ffmpeg.org/legal.html) > > z! > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
