Hi Mark, Thank you once again for that detailed explanation of your ingenious solution! I think I finally understand it now (having spent a few hours working through it) and I might also understand the leaping back behaviour: It looks to me like your interleave filter will output the following sequence of weighted frame index mixes: [0+0], [0+1], [0+1], [0+1], [0+1], [1+1], [2+3], [2+3], [2+3], [2+3], *[2+2]*, [2+3], [2+3], [2+3], [2+3], [3+3], [4+5], [4+5], [4+5], [4+5], *[4+4]*...
Is that right? I've attached a spreadsheet that shows how I see the command behaving for the first 35 frames. Also, am I correct in thinking that there is a decimate stage that isn't shown in the command you shared? I think the fact that you're missing some of this email thread might be because I didn't "reply all" at some point. Sorry about that. I'll happily forward the entire thread to you personally if you like. Best wishes, Bruce.
mix_interleave.xlsx
Description: MS-Excel 2007 spreadsheet
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
