On 2021-04-19 00:55, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2021-04-14 22:33, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
...So, luma = 0.2126 * r + 0.7152 * g + 0.0722 * b, a value in [0.0,
1.0] for r, g, b in [0.0, 1.0]
But the default values I see in the FFmpeg vibrance filter are[4]:
rlum (default 0.072186), glum (default 0.715158), blum (default
0.212656)
Thus it looks like the default values for rlum and blum are swapped....
I entered ticket #9195, "vibrance (video filter) incorrect defaults
for luma", https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/9195 , to track this.
Someone closed this ticket as "wontfix", without comment about why the
current behaviour is correct, or if incorrect, why the ticket should be
ignored. I suspect that person is the author of the vibrance filter. If
that is true, then the author of the filter is declining to respond to a
good-faith bug report about the filter.
That makes me despair of getting the filter corrected (if incorrect). I
think that is a sad situation for the project.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
