On Fri 11 Feb 2022 at 16:25, Carl Zwanzig <c...@tuunq.com> wrote: > On 2/11/2022 6:39 AM, Jens Berger wrote: > > This line seems to be weird to me, but I cannot find more about this > > problem: > > > > ����sof0: picture: 258x28928 > > If that is trying to report the size of the picture, 28k is > unrealistically > large. Might be correct but... > > > > Please - can somebody have a look on this problem? > > Two of the first rules of this list are to post the complete and unedited > output of ffmpeg and to use the most current ffmpeg available,
Would I be correct in thinking that even though a verbose Ffmpeg log was posted, the use of -hide_banner removed ffmpeg version info, so the OP should remove this value? Best, Kieran O’Leary National Library of Ireland which may > require downloading from from the ffmpeg.org site (for instance, the > packages of some linux distributions lag months or years behind current). > The latter probably has no effect here, but it's still a good idea. > > See https://ffmpeg.org/mailing-list-faq.html > > Late,r > > z! > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
