It’s no problem at all. Btw, it’s very common to store progressive as interlaced, as broadcast still requires interlaced material, no matter how it is shot.
From memory, just do a -c copy and you’ll end up with the source in a progressive container. Bouke > On 05 Dec 2022, at 11:56, Steinar Apalnes <stei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > As the title says, is this at all possible? My concern is mostly with mpeg2 > and h264 that have content of one type but encoded/marked as another. Most > notably content that has progressive video but stored interlaced. So I'm > probably talking about a bit stream filter here because just setting the > "field_order", "top" etc. flags when rewrapping does nothing.But I have not > found anything in the official docs that suggest this is currently possible > so it would be nice if some of you developers could shed some light on this. > > Thanks, > Steinar Apalnes > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
