I would like to see FFMPEG support "VR/AR" codecs. These are optimized protocol buffers using dimensional reduction techniques. Nothing smart Sophmores cannot understand. I personally want no association to any operating company such as Meta. Would any readers be interested in discussing a two year build plan for either FFMPEG or a similar build? Email me directly to avoid spamming the entire list until we know the project is solid for the FFMPEG community?
Lastly: I would like to continue building a cloud based infrastructure for video. Software engineers or audio/video engineers interested could consider reaching out to me directly. Thanks! 10/10 FFMPEG! https://newatlas.com/vr/meta-photorealistic-avatars/ On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 12:21 PM Classic SSG Enjoyer < adityadandavat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay!. Thank you. Nice to hear that video codecs like libx264 be will > supported by FFMPEG lifelong. > > > Thank you very much.🙏 > > On Sun, 15 Oct, 2023, 9:47 pm Reindl Harald, <h.rei...@thelounge.net> > wrote: > > > > > > > Am 15.10.23 um 18:07 schrieb Classic SSG Enjoyer: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am a user of FFMPEG. Its a great software. It gets 10/10 from me! > > > > > > Sir, as you know that libx264 is widely used and other video codecs > like > > > mpeg2video, theora etc, are not much used today. > > > > > > So, as time will go on, its likely that video codecs like VP9, HEVC, > AV1, > > > VVC will be the video codecs of the future as the world is transferring > > > from resolutions like 720p and 1080p to 4K, 8K UHD resolutions and > these > > > codecs provide significant bitrate savings over AVC. > > > > > > But, when HEVC, VP9, etc codecs rule the world in future years e.g 10 > > > years, then will the support of old video codecs at like libx264 be > > removed > > > or will FFMPEG keep supporting the video codecs at that time? > > > > why should it? > > > > you can still encode/decode old AVI stuff from the 1990's and H264 will > > be for a very long time preferable - on a server where customers are > > uploading videos which needs to be converted to something <video> > > supports you need much more cpu power using x265 versus x264 and it > > takes ages > > > > ffmpeg don't implemnt all stuff itself and libraries like libx264 won't > > go away - why and how should they? > > _______________________________________________ > > ffmpeg-user mailing list > > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".