On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marc via ffmpeg-user < ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> I spent some time looking into options and came across this paper by the > authors of pyloudnorm. > There's also a section comparing a few different implementations of EBU > R 128. > > https://csteinmetz1.github.io/pyloudnorm-eval/paper/pyloudnorm_preprint.pdf That paper is invalid. FFmpeg have 2 implementations: loudnorm(uses older libebur copy ) and ebur128(which is only a scanner) Of course if they used loudnorm only it would get bad performance, as loudnorm in current repo is bad filter in any sense. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
