On Sat, 7 May 2011 18:56:31 -0400 Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are many tools, such as linux-ha, redhat-piranha, that do high > availability and failover. The normal FHS calls for application data > to be in /var, but having that move onto the failover partner is, > imo, a bad idea. I don't want /var/logs, for example not being > available to the ha partner which isn't running any services at the > moment. Does this relate to the "FHS exported filesystems" post from a few days ago? I don't deal with HA, so I don't really understand the details here. thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
