On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:23:11 -0400 Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 12:02 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 02:42:03PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> Well, I certainly always had in mind creating /run/user, when we > >> pushed for /run. > > > > Well, it certainly wasn't in *our* minds. > > Looking at it from a FHS perspective, it seems we have two proposals. > /run itself isn't controversial, and though /run/user is, distros > should be free to use it or not as long as $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR has some > sane implementation. i'd leave stuff for xdg right alone in this instance, unless its just a 'if you want a guide, look at xdg' like what was suggested for $HOME/ contents. > So, we should specify /run in the FHS and leave /run/user as an > implementation detail for the XDG spec. > > Does that sound about right? Sounds about right to me. Just wondering if the bsd people have something to say about it being a requirement. thanks, kk (oh, seems someone did post. my bad :)) -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
