Frank Paris wrote: > > > > As much as I like science and the scientific method, it is, when it > > comes down to it, just another religion, and I don't like science > > zealots (I'm not suggesting Roger is one, BTW). > > > > That is total bunk. Scientism may be a religion, but science isn't. Saying > it is indicates you don't know what it is. > Oh, Frank, Spoken like someone whose religion was just challenged. I'm told if I really knew God I wouldn't question him either. Science is whatever the ruling scientist claim is true now. I suppose its actually almost all "bad science" since so much of it ends up changed or re-written as we go along. Even "laws" like those of gravity fall apart when the objects get small enough. Art
- filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Science & God (was Prin... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi compariso... Jeremy Nicholl
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Jim Snyder
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Roger Smith
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Jim Snyder
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi comparison Austin Franklin