Frank wrote: >What does it mean to say, "they scan a whole lot better than negs"? Do you >mean you don't have to fiddle with the controls as much to get a good image? No, I mean they scan better. The chemical structure of slide film causes fewer problems with aliasing than with negs. >Slides don't have the density range of negatives and are not as forgiving >pushing the parameters around. I presume you meant that slides have a greater density range than negs? :-7 I personally find the grain in scanned negs ugly - even in Reala - and it's frustrating that a neg which looks fine as a photographic print is really hard to get to look as good as a scan. Slides are much simpler to work with, at least in my experience with the LS30. Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- RE: filmscanners: Photoshop Doug Wise
- Re: filmscanners: Photoshop Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see. Guy Prince
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see... Rob Geraghty
- Re[2]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what t... Guy Prince
- Re: Re[2]: filmscanners: Film Scanners an... Rob Geraghty
- Re[4]: filmscanners: Film Scanners a... Guy Prince
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners and ... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners ... Rob Geraghty